Suite à la conférence de Steve de présentation de l'iPad, de nombreux montages photos sur l'évolution de l'iPad, celle-ci est plus marrante, elle montre le prochain iPad en 2012 : iBoard, et le suivant en 2014 : iMat
Thanks Xhark
Tags : iBoard, iMat, iPad
Ahah, c'est très con.
Cool, on pourra jouer au twister en 2014 alors
PS: Quand est-ce que ce site arrête de pomper le design de techcrunch?
The next one, iwall??
Yes, you just made my day. This is sooo gooood.
, especially last one with iMat "breakdance"
Hey, ok, I get it, I guess - but does this really work?
Not bad, but the idea was "borrowed" from this comic:
The third panel is even directly copied from the comic. What, no acknowledgement? Shame on you.
Way to steal a joke that's over a month old. Plagiarism is plagiarism.
Shame on you for blatantly ripping off someone else's work! Honte à vous!
Cela a été copié à partir d'une bande dessinée bien plus tôt:
Don't steal others' work and pass it off as your own!
Thieves! Way to steal another man's joke. I liked it better the first time I read the joke on Stolen Pixels. You also blatantly stole the third frame. So, shame on you.
Thieves, thieves, thieves!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I too protest the theft of frame 3 from a similar comic created by Shamus Young
Did you really think no one would notice this act of piracy?
Your unoriginality is truly awe inspiring
Either pull this piece or acknowledge your source material! I'm a long-time fan of this website, but looking at the links supplied by those complaining, it's obvious that panel three has been stolen. How much of your other stuff has been ripped-off from others? What the hell?!
Shame on you! Check your sources! Look at the third picture in your comic, you're obviously using another's picture and passing it off as your own.
@Toastgoblin: @RustyBadger: @dallen: @GoodApprentice: @Xanyr: @Passerby:
I would not offense you, but the image we published is not yours. For proof, I learned the existence of your website by seeing the link you sent to us..
We find the information, we publish and we quote sources.
For the iPad, we received an email from our reader, and we also put a link to the site of this reader.
The blog author has been advised http://www.shamusyoung.com/twentysidedtale/?p=7371&cpage=1#comment-146440
The person who submitted this plagiarized. They copied images from escapistmagazine.com
The real creator is shamusyoung.com. Blogmotion.fr plagiarized the image.
La personne qui a soumis ce plagié. Ils ont copié des images de escapistmagazine.com
Le vrai créateur est shamusyoung.com. Blogmotion.fr plagié l'image.
@Yoann:
That's just plain bull. Citing the source that plagarized the work does not make it legitimate. It is still plagarized, and a copyright violation. Take it down.
You should at least acknowledge that this was "inspired by" Stolen Pixels, or better yet: "blatantly copied". I mean: The third frame was shopped by Shamus himself and then re-appeared here. Check the release date on the Stolen Pixels. "We got this by e-mail from some guy" is not a source citation. You should be ashamed.
Yes because claiming you got the image via email makes the theft legitimate. Maybe I should look through your archives, steal some of your work (if it is yours) and just claim that I got it via an email.
Oh, and in case you hadn't noticed yet, Shamus Young's work was published and dated a month before yours, so you can stop trying to make it look as if he took your work.
Vous avez copié cette plaisanterie des jeunes de Shamus. J'irais bien avec celui, mais vous d'une manière flagrante avez déchiré au loin le troisième panneau.
Claiming someone emailed you the work doesn't make it YOUR work. It makes it failure to research your sources - and that makes you irresponsible. None of it makes you less criminal: it's still violation of copyright. This piece needs to be removed immediately.
Bonjour.
J’aimerais vous aviser que le comic en lien a ete vole de ce comic original, publie il y a un peu plus d’un mois:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7112-Stolen-Pixels-165-The-Next-Big-Thing-from-Apple
Comme vous pouvez le constater, la 3e photo est un clair copier/coller.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7112-Stolen-Pixels-165-The-Next-Big-Thing-from-Apple
This jokes been done already, 24 days before yours to exact, way to steal
@Yoann:
Be a man and own up to your mistake of publishing a plagiarised work. And just how lame can you get, removing the links to the original comic? Is this how you're taught where you come from, hiding the truth?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7112-Stolen-Pixels-165-The-Next-Big-Thing-from-Apple
You can easily tell that the third panel is a simple upsizing from Shamus's comic here: http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7112-Stolen-Pixels-165-The-Next-Big-Thing-from-Apple
In case you did not notice you boneheads here at begeek.fr, Shamus's Comic Says "Copyright (c) 2010 The Escapist". Yeah, your not stealing from some little blogger, your stealing from a site 50 times larger than you. That means they have 50 times the money too.
Do you REALLY want to go into a legal battle with that? Do you REALLY want your site to die?
Comme vous avez reçu cette image par e-mail, c'est clair que c'est pas vous qui avez plagié quoi que ce soit.
Le problème est que celui qui a créé cette image a copié une partie (le fameux troisième panneau) chez l'escapistmagazine, et cette partie est la création d'un de leurs contributeurs (Shamus Young).
Puisque vous êtes informés, la moindre des choses serait de mettre un lien vers l'escapistmagazine afin de ne pas soutenir le plagiat.
Enough people have pointed out that this idea has been done before and that the actual content from that earlier comic by Shamus Young has been stolen. You need to put a direct link about this at the very top of the post, as well as explain the situation *before* the comic is shown (and only keep the comic to show the similarity between the two works).
Making a note of it somewhere in the long list of comments here is not how to do it at all. Very few people will read that.
@Yoann: What about the techcrunch design rip mentionned above?
@Bastien: Intérêt de ton double commentaire ?
@Vendeesign: Intérêt de ripper le design de Techcrunch? (l'intérêt de mon double commentaire était d'avoir une réponse, mais visiblement je n'en ai pas eu, donc voilà, ça fera un triple commentaire)
@Bastien: Donc aucun intéret. Si tu as une question sur un sujet qui n'a rien à voir avec le thème du billet, il y a un onglet contact, où nos coordonnées sont affichées. Pour clore le sujet, nous n'avons rien "copié", c'est un theme qui est en téléchargement libre et gratuit sur internet, et nous l'avons largement modifié. La nouvelle version en cours de réalisation sera unique pour ton plus grand plaisir.
@Vendeesign: OK, merci
It's time to end this charade. Xhark himself has admitted he got the image from somewhere else. It is time to give credit where credit is due.
I'm perfectly willing to believe that you didn't know the true source of the image when you got it, and that you didn't know that it was plagarized.
However, once the original was pointed out, did you ever bother to actually look at and compare the images? Did you even bother to check the original publication date? Did you ever look at the copyright notice on the image?
If you didn't, then you are being willfully ignorant, which is just making yourself out to be an even bigger jerk. If you did, and are still ignoring the truth, then you are indefensibly despicable.
This was not a "free" image downloaded from the internet as has been put, this is copyrighted material, protected by international copyright law. Whether or not you knew this when you first put it up is irrelevant. You know it now, and you owe an apology to Shamus Young for accusing him of taking your image and making false claims, and you need to take this down now. Link to the original work and cite the source, give teh true author the credit, and maybe you will regain some level of respect.
Now you start deleting comments which complain about you plagiarizing? You do try to make people hate you, right?
@Samuel222:
Now I delete the links in your comments and I did leave one. I explained to the blog of Shamus, Blogmotion was also explained and you know that our image is here : http://twitpic.com/155x4m. Are you stupid continuing to seek here the causes of your unhappiness ?
@Stringycustard:
Very few people will read a note in the article...
jai trouver un concours pour gagner un ipad 3g, pensez vous que sa vaille le coup de s'inscrire ? je voudrais tenter ma chance pour gagner cette ipad pour mes enfants je suis un maman isolée .
merci de me renseigner le concours pour gagner un ipad apple 3g est présent ici forum-ipad4g-pro.com/topic52.html
d'après vous je m'inscrit ?
@Yoann
The fatct that you got the image from twitpic only proves that you have no idea what the original source was or where it came from.
We have shown you the original source, in a copyrighted publication, and have shown that the image was used without the copyright owner's permission. It is not yours, you have no right to it (or any advertising money gained by its use). The continued use of this image is theft, and there is no defense for it.
Take it down.
I hate using web translators, because they usually get everything wrong, but if it's the only way to get my point across:
Le fatct que vous avez obtenu l'image de twitpic prouve seulement que vous n'avez aucune idée de ce que la source d'origine était et où il vient.
Nous vous avons montré la source d'origine, dans une publication de copyright et ont montré que l'image a été utilisée sans la permission du détenteur du copyright. Ce n'est pas la vôtre, vous n'avez pas droit à celle-ci (ou toute somme publicité acquise par son utilisation). L'utilisation continue de cette image, c'est le vol, et il n'y a pas de défense pour elle.
@Blackbird71:
Ok.
There are ways to ask politely and with understanding.
There are ways to ask aggressively without thinking...
With all this drama, you don't chose the right solution.
Yes, I have no idea what the original source was or where it came from and, today I have no proof that the real source was pronounced.
Sorry...
@Yoann
When people tried polite, you went to Shamus' site and told him he didn't own the image, and accused him of wrongdoing. You continue to deny and ignore the truth. You give no courtesy or respect to the author whose work you have reproduced without permission. What exactly makes you deserving of politeness?
I'll say again, there is proof. Go to http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/comics/stolen-pixels/7112-Stolen-Pixels-165-The-Next-Big-Thing-from-Apple . Look at the dateline under the title - 2 February 2010, 24 days before your post. Take a good look at panel 3, and compare it to yours, compare all the little app symbols; they are identical, it is the same image. Now scroll to the bottom. See that line that says "Copyright 2010 The Escapist"? That means that they own the rights to the image, not you. Denying this any further is just being willfully ignorant.
Lol, so funny.!